Mechanical Music Digest Gallery |
You Are Not Logged In | Login/Get New Account |
Please Log In. Accounts are free!
Logged In users are granted additional features including a more current version of the Archives and a simplified process for submitting articles. |
MMD Gallery Tech breen_xylo |
End-of-Year Fundraising Drive In Progress. Please visit our home page to see this and other announcements:
https://www.mmdigest.com Thank you. --Jody
|
by Jack Breen (980321 MMDigest) The short answer to the question about why the center of a xylophone bar is scooped out is that this increases the volume and resonance of the bar while decreasing the pitch. If, for example, the center section of a bar is one-half the overall thickness, then its pitch will be an octave lower than it would have been without the scoop. The bar will have much better tone and volume for a given pitch than the longer full-thickness bar of the same pitch. If you are trying to tune a bar, you can increase its pitch by sanding off the length, and you can decrease the pitch by sanding the scoop a little deeper. It is amazing how little material needs to be removed to change the pitch, especially on the thickness. Several years ago, I built a large xylophone using some red oak I had in my shop, based on an article I read in the American Woodworker magazine dated December 1990. Because I was expanding the size of the project from the magazine, I needed to understand how to calculate the bar dimensions. I started with stock that was 0.75 inch thick and 1.5 inch wide. I was mounting the bars at two points, which should theoretically be placed one-quarter of the overall length in from each end. Unfortunately, there are losses and other problems in real materials, so the best point is actually 0.2235 times the overall length for the position of the supports from each end. I made the scooped out section equal to half the overall thickness (0.375 inch) and 1 inch narrower than the distance between the supports. Now I needed to determine the length of the bars. Since every species of wood behaves differently (as do different pieces of wood from the same species), experimentation turns out to be the best method of determining the length of a starter piece. After that, the lengths follow a simple mathematical progression, which can be fine-tuned with minor sanding, as described in the first paragraph. For me, A(440) had a length of 8.25 inches. The support points were 1.9 inches in from each end and the scoop-out length was 3.7 inches long. The ratio between adjacent half-steps in a chromatic scale is 2^(1/12), and the length ratio between adjacent half-step bars is 2^(-1/24). Thus, bars two octaves apart are twice as long as each other. This is probably more information than was needed to answer the original question, but it may come in useful for anyone wishing to either fine tune existing bars or to replace missing ones. The attached Excel file is an example of bar calculations for your information, in case anyone wants more details. Thanks for your great publication which I thoroughly enjoy. John J. Breen
Excel spreadsheet file: breen_xyloph3.xls (26 kb)
XYLOPHONE BAR DIMENSION CALCULATIONS Material: Red Oak Width: 1.5 inches Thickness: .750 inches (half of width for harmonics) Thinned Section Thickness: .375 inch (half of thickness for harmonics) Nodes are the mounting points for the bars. OVERALL NODE THIN NOTE FREQ LENGTH LOCATION LENGTH A 55.000 23.335 5.232 11.871 A# 58.270 22.670 5.083 11.505 B 61.735 22.025 4.938 11.149 C 65.406 21.398 4.797 10.803 C# 69.296 20.789 4.661 10.467 D 73.416 20.197 4.528 10.141 D# 77.782 19.622 4.399 9.823 E 82.407 19.063 4.274 9.515 F 87.307 18.521 4.152 9.216 F# 92.499 17.993 4.034 8.925 G 97.999 17.481 3.919 8.643 G# 103.826 16.983 3.808 8.368 A 110.000 16.500 3.699 8.101 A# 116.541 16.030 3.594 7.842 B 123.471 15.574 3.492 7.591 C 130.813 15.131 3.392 7.346 C# 138.591 14.700 3.296 7.108 D 146.832 14.281 3.202 6.878 D# 155.563 13.875 3.111 6.653 E 164.814 13.480 3.022 6.435 F 174.614 13.096 2.936 6.224 F# 184.997 12.723 2.853 6.018 G 195.998 12.361 2.771 5.818 G# 207.652 12.009 2.692 5.624 A 220.000 11.667 2.616 5.436 A# 233.082 11.335 2.541 5.252 B 246.942 11.012 2.469 5.074 C 261.626 10.699 2.399 4.902 C# 277.183 10.394 2.330 4.734 D 293.665 10.098 2.264 4.570 D# 311.127 9.811 2.200 4.412 E 329.628 9.532 2.137 4.258 F 349.228 9.260 2.076 4.108 F# 369.994 8.997 2.017 3.963 G 391.995 8.741 1.960 3.821 G# 415.305 8.492 1.904 3.684 A 440.000 8.250 1.850 3.551 A# 466.164 8.015 1.797 3.421 B 493.883 7.787 1.746 3.295 C 523.251 7.565 1.696 3.173 C# 554.365 7.350 1.648 3.054 D 587.330 7.141 1.601 2.939 D# 622.254 6.937 1.555 2.827 E 659.255 6.740 1.511 2.718 F 698.456 6.548 1.468 2.612 F# 739.989 6.362 1.426 2.509 G 783.991 6.181 1.386 2.409 G# 830.609 6.005 1.346 2.312 A 880.000 5.834 1.308 2.218 A# 932.328 5.668 1.271 2.126 B 987.767 5.506 1.234 2.037 C 1046.502 5.349 1.199 1.951 C# 1108.731 5.197 1.165 1.867 D 1174.659 5.049 1.132 1.785 D# 1244.508 4.905 1.100 1.706 E 1318.510 4.766 1.068 1.629 F 1396.913 4.630 1.038 1.554 F# 1479.978 4.498 1.009 1.481 G 1567.982 4.370 0.980 1.411 G# 1661.219 4.246 0.952 1.342 A 1760.000 4.125 0.925 1.275
|
|
|
|
|
CONTACT FORM: Click HERE to write to the editor, or to post a message about Mechanical Musical Instruments to the MMD Unless otherwise noted, all opinions are those of the individual authors and may not represent those of the editors. Compilation copyright 1995-2024 by Jody Kravitz. Please read our Republication Policy before copying information from or creating links to this web site. Click HERE to contact the webmaster regarding problems with the website. |
|
||||||
|