Mechanical Music Digest  Archives
You Are Not Logged In Login/Get New Account
Please Log In. Accounts are free!
Logged In users are granted additional features including a more current version of the Archives and a simplified process for submitting articles.
Home Archives Calendar Gallery Store Links Info

End-of-Year Fundraising Drive In Progress. Please visit our home page to see this and other announcements: https://www.mmdigest.com     Thank you. --Jody

MMD > Archives > November 2019 > 2019.11.02 > 03Prev  Next


Tempo Compensation Methods
By Spencer Chase

I am not an expert on the history or roll perforators but I think that
commercial roll perforation did not use the simple method of matching
a take up spool in the perforator with the one in the target piano.
This is because multiple sheets were punched and a simple take up spool
would not work.

I believe that all commercial perforators used some sort of device that
gripped the paper stack and moved it by a fixed increment.  I sort of
remember that on at least one machine used to punch Wurlitzer multi-tune
rolls, that the step rate was adjustable and was changed for tunes later
in the roll.  However it is possible that a master could be created with
tempo acceleration compensation in this way but I believe that masters
were generally not the same length as the finished roll.

There is one other thing that I don't think was considered in this
thread and which may have no basis in fact but was discussed in the
past.  It was suggested that some piano take-up mechanisms might
gradually slow down as the roll builds due to limited power available
from the wind motor.  The speed is controlled by the volume of [air
under] vacuum drawn from the wind motor.  A vacuum regulator keeps the
vacuum constant but the speed is controlled by volume.

Is it possible that with fixed volume and an increased load on the wind
motor that the load would increase as more paper was added to the take
up spool and the take up speed would slow down possibly correcting for
the effect of the increased diameter?  Is there any reason that the load
would increase as the paper builds?

This is more than I can try to make sense out of.  I just remember
someone proposing the idea in the past.  If this were the case then roll
acceleration compensation in the perforating might not be necessary.

Spencer Chase


(Message sent Sat 2 Nov 2019, 07:21:53 GMT, from time zone GMT-0700.)

Key Words in Subject:  Compensation, Methods, Tempo

Home    Archives    Calendar    Gallery    Store    Links    Info   


Enter text below to search the MMD Website with Google



CONTACT FORM: Click HERE to write to the editor, or to post a message about Mechanical Musical Instruments to the MMD

Unless otherwise noted, all opinions are those of the individual authors and may not represent those of the editors. Compilation copyright 1995-2024 by Jody Kravitz.

Please read our Republication Policy before copying information from or creating links to this web site.

Click HERE to contact the webmaster regarding problems with the website.

Please support publication of the MMD by donating online

Please Support Publication of the MMD with your Generous Donation

Pay via PayPal

No PayPal account required

                                     
Translate This Page