Mechanical Music Digest  Archives
You Are Not Logged In Login/Get New Account
Please Log In. Accounts are free!
Logged In users are granted additional features including a more current version of the Archives and a simplified process for submitting articles.
Home Archives Calendar Gallery Store Links Info

End-of-Year Fundraising Drive In Progress. Please visit our home page to see this and other announcements: https://www.mmdigest.com     Thank you. --Jody

MMD > Archives > May 2018 > 2018.05.06 > 01Prev  Next


Player Pianos vs. Live Performances
By John A. Tuttle

Hi All,  While this will probably be received as somewhat irrelevant,
one has to ask, "What would Chopin say about Pollini's performance?"

On a more relevant note, I don't know of any pianist who can play
the same piece of music exactly the same twice.  Unlike a computer
(or a digital recording), the human brain is incapable of 'calling up
a past performance and duplicating that performance'.  Changes in
personal temperament and physical condition preclude us from robot-like
performance.

While the difference/s in the performance might be so slight as to go
unnoticed by even the most acute critic, an honest musician knows when
'he nailed it' and when he simply didn't make any mistakes (there's
a difference!).  But even when, in his own mind, he nails it, that
opinion is based on his subjective understanding or belief of how the
piece is suppose to be played.

Regarding the differences, let's start with the fact that the 1937
performance by Hofmann is 3 min. 11 sec. in length while the Pollini
performance is 4 min. 21 sec. in length.  The Duo-Art performance
[ played by Josef Hofmann] is 3 min. 54 sec. in length.

Secondly, the Hofmann and Pollini performances are markedly different
in numerous ways.  The differences in the balance between the volumes
of the accompaniment (left hand) and the melody (right hand) is
unmistakable.  It's not so surprising then that the Duo-Art performance
is much more like the Hofmann performance than the Pollini performance.

Admittedly, the first minute or so of the Duo-Art performance leaves
much to be desired.  It has a mechanical nature that truly detracts
from the beauty of the piece.  Later in the piece, as compared to the
Hofmann performance, it gets better, but it still lacks personality.

The composite picture of the three files, side-by-side, shows the many
differences in the volume alone:

 [ Chopin by Duo Art, Hofmann, and Pollini
 [ http://www.mmdigest.com/Attachments/18/05/06/180506_142300_Chopin%20Berceuse%20in%20D%20flat%20major%20Andante%20Op%2057.jpg 

Musically,
John A Tuttle
Player-Care
Brick, New Jersey, USA

 [ Maurizio Pollini plays Chopin's Berceuse in D-flat major
 [ at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRZBw9_4Jh0 
 [ Josef Hofmann's 1937 Golden Jubilee live performance is at
 [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eU2k0VaMQo 
 [ Compare with the Duo-Art roll played by Josef Hofmann (10/26)
 [ at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pcp4RWK1T34 
 [ -- Robbie


(Message sent Sun 6 May 2018, 21:23:00 GMT, from time zone GMT-0700.)

Key Words in Subject:  Live, Performances, Pianos, Player, vs

Home    Archives    Calendar    Gallery    Store    Links    Info   


Enter text below to search the MMD Website with Google



CONTACT FORM: Click HERE to write to the editor, or to post a message about Mechanical Musical Instruments to the MMD

Unless otherwise noted, all opinions are those of the individual authors and may not represent those of the editors. Compilation copyright 1995-2024 by Jody Kravitz.

Please read our Republication Policy before copying information from or creating links to this web site.

Click HERE to contact the webmaster regarding problems with the website.

Please support publication of the MMD by donating online

Please Support Publication of the MMD with your Generous Donation

Pay via PayPal

No PayPal account required

                                     
Translate This Page