Randolph Herr and Claus Kucher found these interesting research papers:
(1)
Are computer-controlled pianos a reliable tool in music
performance research? Recording and reproduction precision of a
Yamaha Disklavier grand piano, by Werner Goebl and Roberto Bresin,
presented at MOSART IHP Network Workshop on Current Research
Directions in Computer Music, Audiovisual Institute, Pompeu Fabra
University, Barcelona, Nov. 15-17, 2001.
The paper can be downloaded for viewing at
http://www.ai.univie.ac.at/cgi-bin/tr-online?number+2001-27
The authors are
Gerhard Widmer, Department of Medical Cybernetics and Artificial
Intelligence, University of Vienna, and Austrian Research Institute
for Artificial Intelligence (OeFAI), Vienna
Roberto Bresin, Department of Speech, Music, and Hearing (TMH),
Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm
From the PDF document:
4.3 Relation of hammer velocity to MIDI velocity
The relation between hammer velocity in meters per second and
MIDI velocity is well matched by a logarithmic curve (see Figure
3). This figure shows also at what MIDI velocity the solenoids do
not increase their drive force anymore. For the lower keys it is
already at around 85, the middle keys (G2 - C5) saturate at around
90, only the G6 increases its hammer velocity up to a MIDI velocity
value of 100. However, in an informal recording of expressive
music performances by the authors (over 26000 notes) the majority
of MIDI velocity values were between 40 and 80, the highest value
was 99, the lowest 6. That means that, although in extreme cases
(ff and pp) the piano clearly does not reproduce properly, the
middle range seems to be quite accurate.
Figure 3 Relationship of hammer-velocity to MIDI velocity of
the original performance measured by the Disklavier and its
reproduction. A logarithmic curve is fit onto the original data
(see formula).
The authors note that later models of the Disklavier may show different
characteristics.
(2)
Measurement and reproduction accuracy of computer-controlled
grand pianos, by Werner Goebl and Roberto Bresin, published in
the Proceedings of the Stockholm Music Acoustics Conference,
August 6-9, 2003 (SMAC03), Stockholm, Sweden.
The paper can be downloaded for viewing at
http://www.ai.univie.ac.at/cgi-bin/tr-online?number+2003-04
The abstract posted at http://www.speech.kth.se/smac03/abs03_link.html
says
The recording and reproducing capabilities of a Yamaha Disklavier
grand piano and a Boesendorfer SE290 computer controlled grand piano
were tested, with the goal of examining their usefulness for
performance research. An experimental setup consisting of
accelerometers and a calibrated microphone is used to capture key
and hammer movements, as well as the acoustic signal. Five selected
keys are played by pianists with two types of touch ('staccato -
legato'). Timing and dynamic differences between the original
performance, the corresponding MIDI file recorded by the
computer-controlled pianos, and its reproduction are analyzed.
The two devices performed quite differently with respect to timing
and dynamic accuracy. The Disklavier's onset capturing is slightly
more precise (+/-10 ms) than its reproduction (-20 to +30 ms), the
Boesendorfer performs generally better, but its timing accuracy is
slightly less precise for recording (-10 to 3 ms) than for
reproduction (+/-2 ms). Both devices exhibit a systematic (linear)
error in recording over time. In the dynamic dimension, the
Boesendorfer shows higher consistency over the whole dynamic range,
while the Disklavier performs well only in a wide middle range.
Neither device is able to capture or reproduce different types
of touch.
Note: The links at http://www.ai.univie.ac.at/cgi-bin/tr-online?
are faulty. The downloaded file will be named *.html -- it must
then be renamed *.pdf for viewing with Adobe Acrobat reader.
Macintosh users must change the file type from HTML to whatever
a PDF type is at the Mac.
Robbie Rhodes
Etiwanda, Calif.
|