Mechanical Music Digest  Archives
You Are Not Logged In Login/Get New Account
Please Log In. Accounts are free!
Logged In users are granted additional features including a more current version of the Archives and a simplified process for submitting articles.
Home Archives Calendar Gallery Store Links Info

End-of-Year Fundraising Drive In Progress. Please visit our home page to see this and other announcements: https://www.mmdigest.com     Thank you. --Jody

MMD > Archives > August 2001 > 2001.08.24 > 04Prev  Next


Same Arrangement on Different Music Roll Brands
By Jerry F. Bacon

In response to John Miller:  At around 1922 QRS started buying up its
competition; Imperial was first.  At first they did not dabble too much
with the arrangements, but by 1925 very often they would have some
extra introductions and fillers cut and they would replace some of
these parts.  But the main bodies of a song would be the same as QRS.

Then they bought U.S. Music and the same thing would happen to them.
I would love to have heard "My Blue Heaven" as arranged by Horace O.
Prell or Carl Ober, but QRS had already bought them, and as soon as
they did so U.S. became another poor cousin.  Also QRS (as Imperial
Industries) made rolls for Gimbels, Weile Special, Symphony -- who
knows who else -- using the same roll but a different box label.

Later QRS put double numbers on the roll and all they had to do was put
either an Imperial label on it or a QRS label; the number on the roll
took care of both.

Atlas rolls made Atlas, Landay, Radio, Acme and Ritz.  All of these are
the same Atlas roll.  Staffnote made Playrite, Hitz, Staffnote and others.

Nearly everyone sold rolls in those days: jewelry stores, furniture
stores, music stores, department stores, appliance stores, etc.  Many
of these stores wanted their own labels, so the factory put something
special on the box just for them.  If the box is missing there is no
clue on the roll and if the tune info on the leader is torn off there
is really no clue.

I have read comments about arrangements being 'organistic'.  Well,
I submit to you they were.  The factories wanted to get the most mileage
out of a master so after a certain time they made the arrangement
suitable for every medium of the day: Fotoplayers, nickelodeons, and
player pianos with and without damper devices, etc.  Ampico did this
to some extent in regards to the damper device.

There are superb arrangements out there, some much much better than,
say, Pete Wendling.  He also did some sublime stuff.  I have an
"Alcoholic Blues" played by Clarence Jones that really puts the others
to shame (in my opinion).

There's something out there for everyone, but look at the roll: look at
the way it's punched, and look at the printing of the words.  Usually
you can tell if it's the same company.

How many of you are aware that there are _two_ distinct arrangements of
QRS 995, with the same label info, with the sole difference of one
having only _one_ artist.  QRS 1938 also has two versions with the same
number.

Sincerely,

Jerry F. Bacon


(Message sent Fri 24 Aug 2001, 15:12:35 GMT, from time zone GMT-0400.)

Key Words in Subject:  Arrangement, Brands, Different, Music, Roll, Same

Home    Archives    Calendar    Gallery    Store    Links    Info   


Enter text below to search the MMD Website with Google



CONTACT FORM: Click HERE to write to the editor, or to post a message about Mechanical Musical Instruments to the MMD

Unless otherwise noted, all opinions are those of the individual authors and may not represent those of the editors. Compilation copyright 1995-2024 by Jody Kravitz.

Please read our Republication Policy before copying information from or creating links to this web site.

Click HERE to contact the webmaster regarding problems with the website.

Please support publication of the MMD by donating online

Please Support Publication of the MMD with your Generous Donation

Pay via PayPal

No PayPal account required

                                     
Translate This Page