MMD Editorial Practices etc.
By Chuck Walker
I have been reading and digesting the comments on a variety of sub- jects in these pages for some time now and wish to add a few of my own opinions. First, I heartily endorse the past editorial comment policy that has been so effectively used up until now. They are clearly identifiable as such and I think they add to the content rather than detract. I realize that this is no small task and Jody and Robbie are deserving of our unswerving gratitude.
The information content of this digest is extremely high with little junk or garbage to wade through. This makes the total package much more usable. Witness the brief exchange of info on the Clay musical clocks some time back. This is the very sort of thing that makes Internet exchange worth while. In short, thanks guys, for keeping the signal-to- noise ratio so high.
I think most everyone is in agreement that musical styles are personal taste matters but any style is fair game to at least experiment with on mechanical music devices. One suspects that musical selections so produced in the past may not have always been universally appealing. But we really do not know that for sure as we were not there at the time to note the reaction of the public. It is fun to speculate on esoteric questions of this sort but we must realize that we may not be able to ever answer them.
I do think that we frequently tend to focus almost exclusively on our instruments and ignore the music that was produced for them. A well-done arrangement may say something unique even on a second rate instrument or a machine not in our list of favorites. When asked what to look for in a music box, Etienne Blyelle said at the MBSI annual meeting last year in Orlando, "Don't look, listen". I would like to suggest that we appreciate both instruments and their music and keep open minds about all of it.
As for demographic data, Nancy Fratti said that age is a state of mind so that makes me, oh, say, maybe 39? While curious, the distribution of ages in this digest is a function of many more factors than an interest in mechanical music. The data are flawed samples biased by the fact that the responders must be at a technological level to have at least e-mail capability. Secondly the responders must have had some connection to lead them to the digest. If not Internet then it is by hearsay.
So we really only have a subset of computer-with-modem users who have discovered this fine digest and are subscribers and, I might add, willing to respond to this request for data. Nevertheless, it will be fun to see what develops. The geographic distribution will be interesting.
Chuck Walker
9/31
Hopewell Junction, NY 12533
cewalker@prodigy.com
[ The suspicious statistician would note that the respondents of
[ the survey are "self-selecting" -- hardly scientific, but it's
[ nonetheless fun. A normal distribution of ages will be symmetrical
[ about the average. I'm curious, though, if we have a gap in the
[ 25-35 age group. With enough respondents this gap might be evident.
[ -- Robbie |
(Message sent Mon 17 Feb 1997, 04:07:15 GMT, from time zone GMT-0500.) |
|
|
Mechanical
Music Digest™ Archives
