Mechanical Music Digest  Archives
You Are Not Logged In Login/Get New Account
Please Log In. Accounts are free!
Logged In users are granted additional features including a more current version of the Archives and a simplified process for submitting articles.
Home Archives Calendar Gallery Store Links Info
MMD > Archives > March 1996 > 1996.03.06 > 03Prev  Next


Wayne Stahnke's MIDI File
By Jim Heyworth

Wayne Stahnke wrote:

> I suggest that you
> take the time to pull the file up on your computer screen and examine it
> carefully with a copy of the roll (and a straightedge) at hand. You will
> find that all of the perforations are at their correct places, as determined
> by counting punch steps. A new roll made from this file would be identical
> to a roll made in the 1920s.

Well, I uudecoded and pkunzipped and got the MIDI file 68283b.mid. Now what do I do with it ? If I look at it with my antique "Cakewalk" I will go blind or, more realistically, not-so-quietly crazy before I can determine the accuracy of the work.

How should I go about doing this in a sane fashion ?

I _know_ I shouldn't have tried to "play" it, but I did anyway. Yes it is the right "Menuet" all right, but it comes over like a Duo-Art roll played on an Ampico at tempo 800. I can see that the expression perforations are at both ends of the tracker scale as expected, but that is about all.

> We have been entrusted
> with a precious legacy, and we have a duty to preserve and protect it.
> Preservation of the performances on these rolls must not be corrupted by
> scanner errors, or we will have failed to live up to our responsibility to
> the artists and engineers who created them, and to future generations of
> listeners.

I still have this queasy, uneasy feeling that data and software formats in general seem to have a considerably shorter lifetime than piano rolls. How are we to assure that 100 years from now the files will still be in usable form ? ie. Will some poor soul be confronted with the problem of converting what will then be the equivalent of a deteriorating 135K floppy disc into the then current working format ? Remember, we _were_ happy with 135K floppies 15+ years ago! Another example: Pianocorder tapes are beginning to fall apart already.

Please don't take this as undue criticism of a lot of hard and very worthwhile work. I am just concerned that something very fundamental may be missing from this equation and we are caught up in the technology without taking adequate note of some of its very basic limitations.

Perhaps if there are any librarians or conservators on the list they may have some comments ?

Jim Heyworth --- james_heyworth@sunshine.net


(Message sent Wed 6 Mar 1996, 19:32:00 GMT, from time zone GMT-0800.)

Key Words in Subject:  File, MIDI, Stahnke's, Wayne

Home    Archives    Calendar    Gallery    Store    Links    Info   


Enter text below to search the MMD Website with Google



CONTACT FORM: Click HERE to write to the editor, or to post a message about Mechanical Musical Instruments to the MMD

Unless otherwise noted, all opinions are those of the individual authors and may not represent those of the editors. Compilation copyright 1995-2024 by Jody Kravitz.

Please read our Republication Policy before copying information from or creating links to this web site.

Click HERE to contact the webmaster regarding problems with the website.

Please support publication of the MMD by donating online

Please Support Publication of the MMD with your Generous Donation

Pay via PayPal

No PayPal account required

                                     
Translate This Page